| Observing AsterismsPutting the fun back into AstronomyDavid Ratledge |
![]() |
IntroductionThe brain is brilliant at joining up stars and seeing patterns. This of course is how the constellations came about. The term asterism is today taken as patterns of stars that are not constellations. They can be naked-eye objects, e.g. the Plough (Big Dipper), or telescopic/binocular ones e.g. the Coathanger. The stars can be unrelated chance alignments, e.g. Kemble’s Cascade, or part of a related cluster e.g. ET in NGC 457. There are probably some more out there waiting to be discovered – they really only become obvious when someone makes the connection and draws our attention to them. Oh and a good name helps too. ObservingThe asterisms featured here are binocular or small telescope asterisms. For observing them I would recommend image-stabilized binoculars. Although these can cost as much as a small telescope, they are brilliant for tracking down asterisms and perhaps even discovering a new one of your own. They are also easy to carry out into dark skies where they can often show more than a big telescope in light-polluted suburbia. I have used both the Canon 15x50is and 18x50is and can recommend both of them. Remember, observing asterisms is supposed to put a smile on the observer’s face – they are purely for enjoyment. There’s no science or deeper meaning here, just fun. ReferencesThere doesn’t seem to be a definitive list of asterisms. I suppose that’s understandable as perhaps one man’s asterism is another’s jumble of stars. The article that kicked me off observing them was Phil Harrington writing way back in Sky & Telescope, May 1998. His subsequent observing books have included lists of asterisms. Some of the common planetarium software packages (e.g. TheSky) now include a selection of asterisms as do modern goto telescope databases. However, the best online list is by Steve Coe of Saguaro Astronomy Club (SAC) – see their downloads page. Surprisingly, even here there are some omissions, probably most notably there is no mention of one of my favourites the “37” cluster, NGC 2169. The following are asterisms that appealed to me – hope you enjoy them too.
|
Kemble’s CascadeFather Lucian Kemble was a keen binocular observer and, whilst sweeping across featureless Camelopardalis, came across a 2° long string of stars. At the end of the string was the misty patch of open cluster NGC 1502. He likened the asterism to a waterfall ending in a pool. He reported his discovery to Walter Scott Houston and the name Kemble’s Cascade was the result. For a finder chart for Kemble's Cascade see Brian Fenery's site He also provides an animated gif showing how to find the cascade
region at different limiting magnitudes: click here |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
Kemble 2 or Mini-CassiopeiaTurn left at Chi Draconis for this little asterism made up of 7th-8th magnitude coloured stars. Much smaller than Kemble's other asterisms and one best suited to a small telescope. It is a surprisingly close approximation to Cassiopeia. Perhaps should known as Kemble's Kassiopeia! |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 20Da |
Kemble’s KiteThat man again but for some reason this asterism is much less well known. Located in northern Cassiopeia, near to its border with Camelopardalis, this asterism is also about 2° long and represents a diamond shaped kite with a tail. |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
The CoathangerProbably the one that sparked the interest in asterisms for most observers – certainly it's the most famous. Its other name is Brocchi’s Cluster and also Collinder 399. It has a very faint open cluster adjoining it (NGC 6802) on its east or left edge. |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
The Engagement RingAlso known as the Diamond Ring, my best view of this object was with 18x50 image-stabilised binoculars from the dark skies of the Lake District. In these it somehow looked a much more obvious ring than any image can portray. If you are wondering where it is, then the diamond in the engagement ring is Polaris. |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
“IC 37”The answer to Life, the Universe and Everything is not 42 but 37 – it's written in the stars – or more precisely it is in NGC2169. It is not really an IC object, it is shorthand for “I see 37”. With those image-stabilised binoculars the 37 is the right way up – at least for observers in the northern hemisphere it is. It is a bit small for binoculars and is at its best in a telescope, where it is upside down. |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
Pakan’s 3In binoculars this looks more like a McDonald’s M to me rather than a number “3”. Although Sirius is the pointer to this object it is actually in Monoceros and was discovered by Canadian Randy Pakan. Size is about the same as the full Moon so binoculars with a bit of magnification are best, those 15x or 18x IS binoculars are just right. |
![]() |
Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D |
The SailboatNot very well known asterism above Leo containing the star 22 Leonis. Upside down in binoculars with 2 red stars in the mast. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D
|
ETThis object has undergone a name change. Formerly called the Owl Cluster it is more often now called the ET Cluster. The Owl’s eyes have become those of ET. Located just below (south) of the W of Cassiopeia this in one of the best clusters in this constellation. Correct name is NGC 457. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D
|
Delphinus MinorA new one to me which I was not aware of until Sue French wrote about it in Sky and Telescope December 2007. She credited the discovery of this look alike to the constellation Delphinus to Dana Patchick. It is just over a degree tall and best in binoculars. It is located on the western edge of the square of Pegasus. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D
|
The Golf PutterA bit similar to Kemble's Cascade. A 1 degree long string of stars and a cluster at its end. This time the string of stars finishes in a right-angled bend forming the putter head. Open cluster NGC 752 is the ball. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 + Canon 300D
|
Ally's BraidThis asterism was drawn to my attention by it's discoverer Stephen Saber although it is also included in Steve Coe's SAC Asterism Database. It's one of those objects every one has seen, as it is part of the Pleiades, but probably not noticed. It refers to the 7 bright stars located in the SE of the Pleiades arranged in a fairly open V shape. If you are wondering where Ally comes from then it is short for Alcyone, the bright star above the star chain. |
|
|
|
The Seven Sisters of the PoleVery much a binocular asterism, the Seven Sisters of the Pole are a group of brightish stars in a shape reminiscent of the Pleiades. Although the pattern is similar these sisters are larger than the original. Very close by is the old open cluster NGC188 which is just visible in the image below. |
|
| Canon 20Da with 135mm Pentax Lens
|
|
The Flying MinnowPretty group of 5 bright stars, plus several fainter ones, spanning about 3/4 degree in Auriga. It is located just SE of the Flaming Star and includes 16; 18 and 19 Aurigae. I assume it gets its name from its similarity to Delphinus - a bit confusing as we already have an asterism called Delphinus Minor! The open cluster to its east (left) is NGC1893. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 and Canon 20Da
|
Lambda-LambdaLambda Orionis has a pattern of stars around it that, very appropriately, mimics the shape of the Greek letter lambda. One star where you should never forget its name! |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 and Canon 20Da
|
Davis' DogBetween the Hyades and the Pleiades lies a rather prominent grouping of stars, just visible to the naked eye. Can you see a dog? John Davis certainly did and Davis' Dog was born. At 3.5 degrees nose to tail it is too big for telescopes but ideal for binoculars. |
|
![]() |
|
Canon 20Da and 135mm Pentax lens |
|
The Broken Engagement RingPerhaps more a tiara than an engagement ring, but this small grouping of 10 or so stars is perfect for a small telescope. Located just west (right) of Beta Ursa Majoris, the lower of the two pointers, means it is easy to find and visible all year from northern latitudes. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 and Canon 300D |
The Mini-CoathangerMuch fainter (stars mag. 9 to 11) and much smaller (about 20 arcmin long) than the original in Vulpecula, this asterism is to be found in Ursa Minor. Discovered by Tom Whiting (President Erie County Mobile Observers Group). |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 and Canon 20Da
|
StargateLocated in Corvus just 1 degree west of the Sombrero Hat Galaxy (M104), this striking Asterism is named after its similarity to the "Stargate" in the film of the same name. It comprises two equilateral triangles, one inside the other although the inner one is too small to resolve with binoculars - even image stabilised ones - so a telescope is best. The stars range in brightness from Mag. 6.6 to 11.5 and were actually catalogued by FGW Struve as STF1659 in his double/multiple star catalogue. The westerly (rightmost) star has a close companion if you look carefully. So presumably until the film made it famous, this object was is was known as STF1659 - not quite as cool a name as Stargate! Disclaimer: If you are pointing your telescope at this object precisely at the time Aliens come through it and they abduct you - don't blame me! |
|
![]() |
|
RCOS 12.5 inch RC and Apogee Alta U9. |
|
JawsNamed after its supposd likeness to a shark, this asterism is located in Virgo just north-west of the Sombrero Hat Galaxy (M104) and close to the Stargate Asterism. About half a degree long and with stars mags. 7.6 to 11.5 this isn't the brightest asterism for binoculars but the 4 stars making the head are the most prominent feature. This quartet lies at right angles to the body and can either be taken as the shark's open mouth or alternatively, perhaps it is a hammer-head shark? The westermost star it obviousy the shark's dorsal fin. All in all, with M104 and Stargate nearby, this trio are too good to miss. |
![]() |
| Takahashi FSQ106 and Canon 20Da |
Hope you enjoyed these asterisms - if you know some more good ones for binoculars then please let me know. |